3.16.44-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

commit af2e859edd477fa1ea3d1d106f41a595cff3d162 upstream.

=46romconflicting macro parameters, passing the wrong name to
__MUTEX_INITIALIZER and a stray '\', #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER was
very unhappy.

One unnecessary change was to choose to pass &ww_class instead of
implicitly taking the address of the class within the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Fixes: 1b375dc30710 ("mutex: Move ww_mutex definitions to ww_mutex.h")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/ww_mutex.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/ww_mutex.h
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ struct ww_mutex {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class) \
-               , .ww_class = &ww_class
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
+               , .ww_class = class
 #else
-# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, ww_class)
+# define __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class)
 #endif
 
 #define __WW_CLASS_INITIALIZER(ww_class) \
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct ww_mutex {
                , .mutex_name = #ww_class "_mutex" }
 
 #define __WW_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) \
-               { .base = { \__MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) } \
+               { .base =  __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname.base) \
                __WW_CLASS_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname, class) }
 
 #define DEFINE_WW_CLASS(classname) \

Reply via email to