Hi Sylwester,

Here is another patch in case you decide that it is
better to apply this one.

Thanks
--
Gustavo A. R. Silva


==========

Fix the position of the arguments in function call.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1248800
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1269141
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c 
b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
index 1b30be72..25c7a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s3c-camif/camif-capture.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static int s3c_camif_hw_init(struct camif_dev *camif, struct 
camif_vp *vp)
        camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern);
        if (variant->has_img_effect)
                camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx,
-                               camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr);
+                               camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb);
        if (variant->ip_revision == S3C6410_CAMIF_IP_REV)
                camif_hw_set_input_path(vp);
        camif_cfg_video_path(vp);
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ irqreturn_t s3c_camif_irq_handler(int irq, void *priv)
                camif_hw_set_test_pattern(camif, camif->test_pattern);
                if (camif->variant->has_img_effect)
                        camif_hw_set_effect(camif, camif->colorfx,
-                                   camif->colorfx_cb, camif->colorfx_cr);
+                                   camif->colorfx_cr, camif->colorfx_cb);
                vp->state &= ~ST_VP_CONFIG;
        }
 unlock:
-- 
2.5.0

Reply via email to