On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bhumika Goyal <bhumi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Add const to rfkill_ops structures that are only passed as an argument
>> to the functions rfkill_alloc or samsung_new_rfkill. These arguments are
>> of type const, so such structures can be annotated with const.
>
> Change is fine by me, but please split to one patch per vendor.
>

Okay.

Thanks,
Bhumika

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumi...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c      | 2 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c | 2 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c | 4 ++--
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c 
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c
>> index dcd9f40..6b5bbaf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-rbtn.c
>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int rbtn_rfkill_set_block(void *data, bool 
>> blocked)
>>         return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>
>> -static struct rfkill_ops rbtn_ops = {
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops rbtn_ops = {
>>         .query = rbtn_rfkill_query,
>>         .set_block = rbtn_rfkill_set_block,
>>  };
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c 
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> index 24ca9fb..3beec1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c
>> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ static int ideapad_rfk_set(void *data, bool blocked)
>>         return write_ec_cmd(priv->priv->adev->handle, opcode, !blocked);
>>  }
>>
>> -static struct rfkill_ops ideapad_rfk_ops = {
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops ideapad_rfk_ops = {
>>         .set_block = ideapad_rfk_set,
>>  };
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c 
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
>> index 8c146e2..e1e8897 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
>> @@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static int seclinux_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
>>                                  !blocked);
>>  }
>>
>> -static struct rfkill_ops seclinux_rfkill_ops = {
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops seclinux_rfkill_ops = {
>>         .set_block = seclinux_rfkill_set,
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static void swsmi_rfkill_query(struct rfkill *rfkill, 
>> void *priv)
>>         rfkill_set_sw_state(rfkill, !ret);
>>  }
>>
>> -static struct rfkill_ops swsmi_rfkill_ops = {
>> +static const struct rfkill_ops swsmi_rfkill_ops = {
>>         .set_block = swsmi_rfkill_set,
>>         .query = swsmi_rfkill_query,
>>  };
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

Reply via email to