On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:39:50AM +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote: >> [+Arnd] >> >> Ping? >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> Jerome >> >> On 05/31/2017 01:21 PM, Jerome Forissier wrote: >> > tee_drv.h references struct device, but does not include device.h nor >> > platform_device.h. Therefore, if tee_drv.h is included by some file >> > that does not pull device.h nor platform_device.h beforehand, we have a >> > compile warning. Fix this by adding a forward declaration. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Do we need this to fix a warning in mainline, in linux-next, or only in combination with some other patches? I have not run into this warning in my build testing. >> > include/linux/tee_drv.h | 1 + >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> > >> > diff --git a/include/linux/tee_drv.h b/include/linux/tee_drv.h >> > index 8614713..07bd226 100644 >> > --- a/include/linux/tee_drv.h >> > +++ b/include/linux/tee_drv.h >> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ >> > #define TEE_SHM_DMA_BUF BIT(1) /* Memory with dma-buf handle >> > */ >> > #define TEE_SHM_EXT_DMA_BUF BIT(2) /* Memory with dma-buf handle >> > */ >> > >> > +struct device; >> > struct tee_device; >> > struct tee_shm; >> > struct tee_shm_pool; >> > > > Looks good to me. > > Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Can you pick up the patch in your git tree and send a pull request for the appropriate release (4.12-fixes or 4.13)? If you don't expect to send anything else for tee in that release, you can also forward the patch to [email protected] and ask for inclusion. If you just reply with the 'Reviewed-by', I would not expect to have to do anything in the arm-soc tree. Arnd
