Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:55:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:51:55PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > > > > > > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Can you try with the patch below, which is hackish but the minimal fix > > > > at this > > > > point. Later I'll come up with a way of returning a fully configured > > > > cycles > > > > evsel, which will make the tools code simpler, moving more stuff to the > > > > libraries. > > > > > > Yeah, this patch on top of your tree seems to work better now. > > > > So how do we proceed, do you want to keep these two as separate or can I > > squash them together, fix that problem with the unwind library and > > provide a new perf/urgent for you to use? > > > > Off to breakfast now tho :-) > > Your call: I had to unpull, so feel free to rebase your urgent branch.
Ok, I'll rebase it, prepare another pull req after we nail down the unwind one. - Arnaldo
