On Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:12:22 -0700 Kees Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> This was in my for-next/kspp tree, but since it depends on fixes in other > >> trees, the preference is for these to all get carried in -mm instead of > >> in KSPP. > > > > All the patches you sent are already in -next (from the kspp tree?) so > > I can't use them. > > Err... that's what you asked me to send? And I had removed them from > kspp so you could carry them. Oh, OK, I'll take a look later in the week after -next has caught up.
