On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:43:38 -0400 Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> Considering where we are at with respect to the merge window, let's > shelve this for now and I'll merge it after the next merge window > closes. In all likelihood I'll be sending selinux/next up to James > later this week and I'd like this to sit in linux-next for longer than > a few days. That means the change will land in 4.14 at the earliest, right? (Just out of curiosity.) By the way, refpolicy only grants "socket" permissions to a handful of domains, all of which also have the corresponding "unix_dgram_socket" permissions. The fedora policy does the same (according to Stephen); this only leaves custom policies to be potentially affected by this change. Given that the SOCK_RAW->SOCK_DGRAM translation is obscure enough not to be documented anywhere outside the kernel sources, I doubt there are many users of it, anyway. Regards, Luis Ressel
