On Fri 23 Jun 09:15 PDT 2017, Georgi Djakov wrote:

> +static int msm8916_register_clk(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base)
> +{
[..]
> +     regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, base, &a53cc_regmap_config);
> +     if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
> +             dev_err(dev, "failed to init regmap mmio: %d\n", ret);
> +             goto err;
> +     }

I think it would be cleaner if you create the regmap in probe() and we
use that throughout the driver - rather than using two different access
mechanism.

> +
> +     a53cc->clkr.regmap = regmap;
> +
> +     ret = devm_clk_register_regmap(dev, &a53cc->clkr);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "failed to register regmap clock: %d\n", ret);
> +             goto err;
> +     }
> +
> +     ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev->of_node, of_clk_hw_simple_get,
> +                                  &a53cc->clkr.hw);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "failed to add clock provider: %d\n", ret);
> +             goto err;
> +     }
> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +     clk_notifier_unregister(pclk, &a53cc->clk_nb);
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int qcom_apcs_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +     struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>       struct qcom_apcs_ipc *apcs;
>       struct resource *res;
>       unsigned long offset;
> @@ -63,6 +178,13 @@ static int qcom_apcs_ipc_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       if (IS_ERR(base))
>               return PTR_ERR(base);
>  
> +     if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,msm8916-apcs-kpss-global")) {
> +             /* register the APCS mux and divider clock */
> +             ret = msm8916_register_clk(&pdev->dev, base);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     return ret;
> +     }
> +

Don't you need to clean up anything in the below error path and in
remove()?

>       offset = (unsigned long)of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
>  
>       apcs->reg = base + offset;

Other than that I think this looks reasonable.

Regards,
Bjorn

Reply via email to