On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:33:16 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > just something i threw together, not in final form, but it > > represents tossing the legacy PM stuff. at the moment, the > > menuconfig entry for PM_LEGACY lists it as "DEPRECATED", while the > > help screen calls it "obsolete." that's a good sign that it's > > getting close to the time for it to go, and the removal is fairly > > straightforward, but there's no mention of its removal in the > > feature removal schedule file. > > One thing that comes to mind is that you will need some way to make sure > that only one of ACPI and APM get initialized ...
i don't see how that has anything to do with removing legacy PM support. you can select both ACPI and APM *now*. if that's a bad thing, then fixing it is a completely independent issue. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
