* Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com> wrote:

> > Plus, shouldn't we use __packed for 'struct undwarf' to minimize the 
> > structure's size (to 6 bytes AFAICS?) - or is optimal packing of the main 
> > undwarf array already guaranteed on every platform with this layout?
> 
> Ah yes, it should definitely be packed (assuming that doesn't affect 
> performance 
> negatively).

So if I count that correctly that should shave another ~1MB off a typical ~4MB 
table size?

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to