On 29-06-17, 13:50, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:21:57AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 28-06-17, 08:55, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 06/28/2017 03:26 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > > > > +config BOOT_CONSTRAINTS > > > > + bool "Boot constraints for devices" > > > > + default y > > > > > > Why default y? > > > > > > As Linus just wrote yesterday: > > > > > > No. We've tried. The only sensible default (and that I try to enforce) > > > is "new featrures default to 'n'" > > > > Yeah, this should have been n really. > > Given that the default default is to default to n, you don't need to > supply a default that just says what the default default actually is. > Please also avoid silly defaults.
That was nice :) Yeah, will get rid of the default statement here. -- viresh