Hi Rafael, 

Thanks for your review.

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:06:20AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 21, 2017 03:04:34 PM Lee, Chun-Yi wrote:
> > Kernel should decrements the reference count of acpi device
> > when the scheduling of acpi hotplug work is failed, and
> > evaluates _OST to notify BIOS the failure.
> > 
> > v2:
> > To simplify the code. (Andy Shevchenko)
> > 
> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@rjwysocki.net>
> > Cc: Len Brown <l...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevche...@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <j...@suse.com>
> 
> Well, what about:
> 
>     if (!hotplug_event) {
>         acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(adev);
>         return;
>     }
> 
>     if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_hotplug_schedule(adev, type)))
>         return;
> 
>     acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(adev);
> 
> err:
>     acpi_evaluate_ost(handle, type, ost_code, NULL);
> 
> This achieves the same as the patch below to my eyes, but looks
> less convoluted IMO.
> 

Yes, that's better. I will send v3 patch.

Joey Lee

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/bus.c | 9 +++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/bus.c b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > index 34fbe02..91adb71 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> > @@ -427,12 +427,17 @@ static void acpi_bus_notify(acpi_handle handle, u32 
> > type, void *data)
> >         (driver->flags & ACPI_DRIVER_ALL_NOTIFY_EVENTS))
> >             driver->ops.notify(adev, type);
> >  
> > -   if (hotplug_event && ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_hotplug_schedule(adev, type)))
> > -           return;
> > +   if (hotplug_event) {
> > +           if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_hotplug_schedule(adev, type)))
> > +                   return;
> > +           goto err_put_device;
> > +   }
> >  
> >     acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(adev);
> >     return;
> >  
> > + err_put_device:
> > +   acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(adev);
> >   err:
> >     acpi_evaluate_ost(handle, type, ost_code, NULL);
> >  }
> > 
> 

Reply via email to