4.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin Coddington <[email protected]>

commit 501e7a4689378f8b1690089bfdd4f1e12ec22903 upstream.

Now that we have umask support, we shouldn't re-send the mode in a SETATTR
following an exclusive CREATE, or we risk having the same problem fixed in
commit 5334c5bdac92 ("NFS: Send attributes in OPEN request for
NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4_1"), which is that files with S_ISGID will have that
bit stripped away.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <[email protected]>
Fixes: dff25ddb4808 ("nfs: add support for the umask attribute")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2588,7 +2588,8 @@ static inline void nfs4_exclusive_attrse
 
        /* Except MODE, it seems harmless of setting twice. */
        if (opendata->o_arg.createmode != NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE &&
-               attrset[1] & FATTR4_WORD1_MODE)
+               (attrset[1] & FATTR4_WORD1_MODE ||
+                attrset[2] & FATTR4_WORD2_MODE_UMASK))
                sattr->ia_valid &= ~ATTR_MODE;
 
        if (attrset[2] & FATTR4_WORD2_SECURITY_LABEL)


Reply via email to