On 4/15/07, hui Bill Huey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The perception here is that there is that there is this expectation that sections of the Linux kernel are intentionally "churn squated" to prevent any other ideas from creeping in other than of the owner of that subsytem
Strangely enough, my perception is that Ingo is simply trying to address the issues Mike's testing discovered in RDSL and SD. It's not surprising Ingo made it a separate patch set as Con has repeatedly stated that the "problems" are in fact by design and won't be fixed. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/