4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>

commit 5ed386ec09a5d75bcf073967e55e895c2607a5c3 upstream.

When this function fails it just sends a SIGSEGV signal to
user-space using force_sig(). This signal is missing
essential information about the cause, e.g. the trap_nr or
an error code.

Fix this by propagating the error to the only caller of
mpx_handle_bd_fault(), do_bounds(), which sends the correct
SIGSEGV signal to the process.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Fixes: fe3d197f84319 ('x86, mpx: On-demand kernel allocation of bounds tables')
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 arch/x86/mm/mpx.c |   10 +---------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -525,15 +525,7 @@ int mpx_handle_bd_fault(void)
        if (!kernel_managing_mpx_tables(current->mm))
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       if (do_mpx_bt_fault()) {
-               force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
-               /*
-                * The force_sig() is essentially "handling" this
-                * exception, so we do not pass up the error
-                * from do_mpx_bt_fault().
-                */
-       }
-       return 0;
+       return do_mpx_bt_fault();
 }
 
 /*


Reply via email to