Hi,

> Am 03.07.2017 um 14:55 schrieb Sebastian Reichel 
> <[email protected]>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:41:45AM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> And initialize workers and notifiers as soon as possible.
>> 
>> This avoids a potential race if irqs are enabled and triggered too early
>> before the worker is properly set up.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Grygorii Strashko <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c 
>> b/drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c
>> index 1fbbe0cc216a..9d974f1e3957 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/twl4030_charger.c
>> @@ -984,12 +984,27 @@ static int twl4030_bci_probe(struct platform_device 
>> *pdev)
>> 
>>      platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bci);
>> 
>> +    INIT_WORK(&bci->work, twl4030_bci_usb_work);
>> +    INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&bci->current_worker, twl4030_current_worker);
>> +
>>      bci->channel_vac = devm_iio_channel_get(&pdev->dev, "vac");
>>      if (IS_ERR(bci->channel_vac)) {
>>              bci->channel_vac = NULL;
>>              dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "could not request vac iio channel");
>>      }
>> 
>> +    if (bci->dev->of_node) {
>> +            struct device_node *phynode;
>> +
>> +            phynode = of_find_compatible_node(bci->dev->of_node->parent,
>> +                                              NULL, "ti,twl4030-usb");
>> +            if (phynode) {
>> +                    bci->transceiver = devm_usb_get_phy_by_node(
>> +                            bci->dev, phynode, &bci->usb_nb);
>> +                    bci->usb_nb.notifier_call = twl4030_bci_usb_ncb;
> 
> those two should be the other way around.

Seems to work as well (and avoids another potential race condition).

v8 coming instantly.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to