On 06/07/17 05:35, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org>
> 
> commit d59f6617eef0 (genirq: Allow fwnode to carry name information only)
> forgot to do "domain->fwnode = fwnode;" for irqchips being probed via
> ACPI namesapce (DSDT/SSDT), that will break platforms with irqchip such
> as mbigen or qcom irq combiner, set the fwnode back to fix the issue.
> 
> Reported-by: John Garry <john.ga...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun....@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 14fe862..1bc38fa 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -151,7 +151,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle 
> *fwnode, int size,
>                       domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
>                       break;
>               default:
> -                     domain->fwnode = fwnode;
>                       domain->name = fwid->name;
>                       break;
>               }
> @@ -172,7 +171,6 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle 
> *fwnode, int size,
>               strreplace(name, '/', ':');
>  
>               domain->name = name;
> -             domain->fwnode = fwnode;
>               domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_NAME_ALLOCATED;
>       }
>  
> @@ -196,6 +194,7 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle 
> *fwnode, int size,
>       INIT_RADIX_TREE(&domain->revmap_tree, GFP_KERNEL);
>       domain->ops = ops;
>       domain->host_data = host_data;
> +     domain->fwnode = fwnode;
>       domain->hwirq_max = hwirq_max;
>       domain->revmap_size = size;
>       domain->revmap_direct_max_irq = direct_max;
> 

This doesn't seem right.

Why is is_fwnode_irqchip() returning false when presented with an
irqchip probed via the ACPI namespace? That's what you should consider
fixing instead of moving that code around.

Thanks,

        M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Reply via email to