On 07/07, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the f2fs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>
> between commit:
>
> a7c3e901a46f ("mm: introduce kv[mz]alloc helpers")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 8e9a5c32d310 ("f2fs: support plain user/group quota")
>
> from the f2fs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
I've confirmed. Thank you so much.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index fd2e651bad6d,0ca49e60002c..000000000000
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@@ -2074,6 -2155,36 +2158,16 @@@ static inline void *f2fs_kmalloc(struc
> return kmalloc(size, flags);
> }
>
> -static inline void *f2fs_kvmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> -{
> - void *ret;
> -
> - ret = kmalloc(size, flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = __vmalloc(size, flags, PAGE_KERNEL);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> -static inline void *f2fs_kvzalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
> -{
> - void *ret;
> -
> - ret = kzalloc(size, flags | __GFP_NOWARN);
> - if (!ret)
> - ret = __vmalloc(size, flags | __GFP_ZERO, PAGE_KERNEL);
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> + static inline int f2fs_filemap_write_and_wait(struct inode *inode)
> + {
> + int err;
> + retry:
> + err = filemap_write_and_wait(inode->i_mapping);
> + if (err && err == -EAGAIN)
> + goto retry;
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> #define get_inode_mode(i) \
> ((is_inode_flag_set(i, FI_ACL_MODE)) ? \
> (F2FS_I(i)->i_acl_mode) : ((i)->i_mode))
