On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 16:35 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Check for i2c_algorithm structures that are only stored in
> the algo field of an i2c_adapter structure. This field is
> declared const, so i2c_algorithm structures that have this
> property can be declared as const also.
>
> This issue was identified using Coccinelle and the following
> semantic patch:
>
> @r disable optional_qualifier@
> identifier i;
> position p;
> @@
> static struct i2c_algorithm i@p = { ... };
>
> @ok@
> identifier r.i;
> struct i2c_adapter e;
> position p;
> @@
> e.algo = &i@p;
>
> @bad@
> position p != {r.p,ok.p};
> identifier r.i;
> @@
> i@p
>
> @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
> identifier r.i;
> @@
> static
> +const
> struct i2c_algorithm i = { ... };
I don't think it's a good idea to copy'n'paste patch to each change
where you fixing the issue. Can you create a github repository of the
coccinelle recipes and give just a link?
Other than that, I'm fine with the change as long as it compiles without
troubles (had seen recently similar patch that has been sent without
actual testing).
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsi...@embeddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
> index 4012c74..e62799e 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-slave.c
> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static irqreturn_t i2c_dw_isr_slave(int this_irq,
> void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_RETVAL(ret);
> }
>
> -static struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
> +static const struct i2c_algorithm i2c_dw_algo = {
> .functionality = i2c_dw_func,
> .reg_slave = i2c_dw_reg_slave,
> .unreg_slave = i2c_dw_unreg_slave,
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
