From: Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:08:25 +0400
> Otherwise the following calltrace will lead to a wrong > lockdep warning: > > neigh_proxy_process() > `- lock(neigh_table->proxy_queue.lock); > arp_redo /* via tbl->proxy_redo */ > arp_process > neigh_event_ns > neigh_update > skb_queue_purge > `- lock(neighbor->arp_queue.lock); > > This is not a deadlock actually, as neighbor table's proxy_queue > and the neighbor's arp_queue are different queues. > > Lockdep thinks there is a deadlock as both queues are initialized > with skb_queue_head_init() and thus have a common class. Patch applied, thank you. Please provide a proper "Signed-off-by: " line in future patch submissions or else I will ignore your patches entirely. Thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
