On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 7/17/2017 12:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Of course, this all assumes a Gaussian distribution to begin with, if we > > get bimodal (or worse) distributions we can still get it wrong. To fix > > that, we'd need to do something better than what we currently have. > > > > fwiw some time ago I made a chart for predicted vs actual so you can sort > of judge the distribution of things visually
Predicted by what?
Thanks,
tglx
