Em Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 06:41:29PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu: > On 07/21/2017 04:19 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 06:36:55AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu: > > > Currently the --show-total-period option of perf-annotate > > > is different from perf-report's.
> > > For example, perf-report ordinarily shows period and number of samples. > > > # Overhead Samples Period Command Shared Object Symbol > > > 9.83% 102 84813704 test test [.] > > > knapsack > > But this is not what this patch does, it is still doing too many things, > > it should first add sample to those function signatures, leaving the > > "meat" to a followup patch, where we will not be distracted with > > infrastructure needed to do what you describe in the changelog. > > I'm doing it here this time, please look at the result, later. > ok, I'm waiting for it. > And if you give me some sketchy code, that's fine. > If you do, I'll remake this patch based on the result. :) Take a look at the acme/tmp_perf/core, that is where I got yesterday. - Arnaldo
