On 19/04/07 08:54 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Len, > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:42:56 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:28:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Otherwise it looks OK to me, I take the patch. If others have comments > > > or objections, just speak up and submit incremental patches as needed. > > > > > > Now I would like to see platform code actually using this. > > > > Any idea how similar this new driver is to the scx200_i2c driver? As > > far as I can tell that driver is already a bit banged i2c over gpio > > lines. > > The major difference is that the implementation in scx200_i2c is > hardware-specific, while the i2c-gpio driver is a generic one, so it's > a lot better. > > What this means is that i2c-gpio obsoletes scx200_i2c, so I am inclined > to delete scx200_i2c right away. I'm not even sure anyone still uses it > now that scx200_acb has been fixed and is reported to work very well. > If anyone really needs to do I2C over GPIO pins on SCx200, this should > be reimplemented on top of i2c-gpio.
It would also force us to move the Geode GPIO pins to the generic infrastructure, so that would be good. I say delete it - if anybody needs that functionality, then we'll do it the right way. Jordan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/