From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <[email protected]>

'perf annotate' was missing the handler for tracing data records.

Prior to this patch we obtained "unhandled" records when piping trace
events to perf annotate (using -D option to show the dump_printf
messages in process_event_synth_tracing_data_stub):

  $ perf record -o - -e block:bio_free sleep 2 | perf annotate -D --stdio
  ...
  0x78 [0xc]: PERF_RECORD_TRACING_DATA: unhandled!
  ...

Signed-off-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Elena Reshetova <[email protected]>
Cc: Kees Kook <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Turner <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <[email protected]>
Cc: Wang Nan <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 7e33278eff67..6db782dfce96 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ int cmd_annotate(int argc, const char **argv)
                        .namespaces = perf_event__process_namespaces,
                        .attr   = perf_event__process_attr,
                        .build_id = perf_event__process_build_id,
+                       .tracing_data   = perf_event__process_tracing_data,
                        .feature        = perf_event__process_feature,
                        .ordered_events = true,
                        .ordering_requires_timestamps = true,
-- 
2.9.4

Reply via email to