Hi Lennart, On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:59:42 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:54:13AM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > The major difference is that the implementation in scx200_i2c is > > hardware-specific, while the i2c-gpio driver is a generic one, so it's > > a lot better. > > > > What this means is that i2c-gpio obsoletes scx200_i2c, so I am inclined > > to delete scx200_i2c right away. I'm not even sure anyone still uses it > > now that scx200_acb has been fixed and is reported to work very well. > > If anyone really needs to do I2C over GPIO pins on SCx200, this should > > be reimplemented on top of i2c-gpio. > > I use scx200_i2c. The SBC I am using doesn't work with the scx200_acb > (different pins on the cpu after all). I would love to see it > reimplemented using the generic interface, since there isn't that many > lines of code involved as far as I can tell. Well scx200_acb works fine > on a Geode LX board, but not on a Geode SC1200 board. Unless it has > been fixed since 2.6.18, then it still doesn't work, but scx200_i2c > works perfectly fine.
The scx200_acb driver was heavily modified in 2.6.17 and 2.6.18, not much since then. I am not familiar with the hardware so I can't comment on which chips are supposed to work and which aren't. -- Jean Delvare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/