On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 8:43 AM, da...@codemonkey.org.uk
<da...@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> Another NFSv4 KASAN splat, this time from rc3.
>
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in nfs4_exchange_id_done+0x3d7/0x8e0 [nfsv4]

Ugh. It's really hard to tell what access that it - KASAN doesn't
actually give enough information. There's lots of 8-byte accesses
there in that function.

Any chance of getting the output from

   ./scripts/faddr2line vmlinux nfs4_exchange_id_done+0x3d7/0x8e0

or something? That would be extremely useful in general for
stacktraces, but it's doubly useful for KASAN because most *other*
stacktraces tend to have a very limited number of things that can warn
(ie there's one or two WARN_ON() calls in a function), but KASAN can
have tens or hundreds..

                       Linus


> Read of size 8 at addr ffff8804508af528 by task kworker/2:1/34
>
> CPU: 2 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 4.13.0-rc3-think+ #1
> Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> Call Trace:
>  dump_stack+0x68/0xa1
>  print_address_description+0xd9/0x270
>  kasan_report+0x257/0x370
>  ? nfs4_exchange_id_done+0x3d7/0x8e0 [nfsv4]
>  check_memory_region+0x13a/0x1a0
>  __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20
>  nfs4_exchange_id_done+0x3d7/0x8e0 [nfsv4]
>  ? nfs4_exchange_id_release+0xb0/0xb0 [nfsv4]
>  rpc_exit_task+0x69/0x110 [sunrpc]
>  ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
>  ? rpc_destroy_wait_queue+0x20/0x20 [sunrpc]
>  __rpc_execute+0x1a0/0x840 [sunrpc]
>  ? rpc_wake_up_queued_task+0x50/0x50 [sunrpc]
>  ? __lock_is_held+0x9a/0x100
>  ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled.part.16+0x1a/0x30
>  rpc_async_schedule+0x12/0x20 [sunrpc]
>  process_one_work+0x4d5/0xa70
>  ? flush_delayed_work+0x70/0x70
>  ? lock_acquire+0xfc/0x220
>  worker_thread+0x88/0x630
>  ? pci_mmcfg_check_reserved+0xc0/0xc0
>  kthread+0x1a6/0x1f0
>  ? process_one_work+0xa70/0xa70
>  ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0
>  ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40
>
> Allocated by task 1:
>  save_stack_trace+0x1b/0x20
>  save_stack+0x46/0xd0
>  kasan_kmalloc+0xad/0xe0
>  kasan_slab_alloc+0x12/0x20
>  kmem_cache_alloc+0xe0/0x2f0
>  getname_flags+0x43/0x220
>  getname+0x12/0x20
>  do_sys_open+0x14c/0x2b0
>  SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
>  do_syscall_64+0xea/0x260
>  return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a
>
> Freed by task 1:
>  save_stack_trace+0x1b/0x20
>  save_stack+0x46/0xd0
>  kasan_slab_free+0x72/0xc0
>  kmem_cache_free+0xa8/0x300
>  putname+0x80/0x90
>  do_sys_open+0x22f/0x2b0
>  SyS_open+0x1e/0x20
>  do_syscall_64+0xea/0x260
>  return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x7a
>
> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8804508aeac0\x0a which belongs 
> to the cache names_cache of size 4096
> The buggy address is located 2664 bytes inside of\x0a 4096-byte region 
> [ffff8804508aeac0, ffff8804508afac0)
> The buggy address belongs to the page:
> page:ffffea0011422a00 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:          (null) index:0x0
> [CONT START]  compound_mapcount: 0
> flags: 0x8000000000008100(slab|head)
> raw: 8000000000008100 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000100070007
> raw: ffffea00113d6020 ffffea001136e220 ffff8804664f8040 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> Memory state around the buggy address:
>  ffff8804508af400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>  ffff8804508af480: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>>ffff8804508af500: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>                                   ^
>  ffff8804508af580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
>  ffff8804508af600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
> ==================================================================
>

Reply via email to