On 01-08-17, 20:48, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > > I found this by enabling the power:cpu_frequency tracepoint event and > > > checking for deltas with a script. Enabling CPU_FREQ_STATÂ show this: > > > > > > time_in_state: > > > > > > 396000 1609 > > So we still stay at the lowest frequency most of the time. > > Yes
Aren't these numbers you shared were taken after this patch is applied? What's wrong with the numbers then ? > > Maybe can you compare these values with and without this patch to let > > us know? > > Without the patch it is always at low freq. Sampling at a lower > frequency means spikes get ignored. -- viresh
