On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:55:32PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote: > As we already have a pointer to the parent cgroup in > cgroup_destroy_locked(), we don't need to calculate it again > to pass as an argument for cgroup1_check_for_release().
Except for the minor nit earlier, everything in the series looks good to me. Thanks. -- tejun
