Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> writes:

> On 03/08/2017 13:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> +   /* AD, if set, should be supported */
>>> +   if ((address & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT)) {
>>> +           if (!enable_ept_ad_bits)
>>> +                   return false;
>> In theory (I guess) we would have to check here if
>> (vmx->nested.nested_vmx_ept_caps & VMX_EPT_AD_BIT)
>
> Yes, that's a more correct check than enable_ept_ad_bits.
>
>>>
>>> +   page = nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->eptp_list_address);
>>> +   if (!page)
>>> +           return 1;
>>> +
>>> +   l1_eptp_list = kmap(page);
>>> +   address = l1_eptp_list[index];
>>> +   accessed_dirty = !!(address & VMX_EPT_AD_ENABLE_BIT);
>> 
>> Minor nit: Can't you directly do
>> 
>> kunmap(page);
>> nested_release_page_clean(page);
>> 
>> at this point?
>> 
>> We can fix this up later.
>
> You actually can do simply kvm_vcpu_read_guest_page(vcpu,
> vmcs12->eptp_list_address >> PAGE_SHIFT, &address, index * 8, 8).

Thanks Paolo, for the interesting tip. David, I sent a new version with the 
correct
check for AD and using this instead of kmap(page).

> Paolo

Reply via email to