On 06/08/17 12:42 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes:
>> [...]
>>> +#define DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS             0x00000002      /* Use 
>>> next sequence if we've missed */
>> Do you have userspace making use of DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS? If
>> not, drop it.
> I added this so that the new ioctl would be compatible with the old
> ioctl; do you think that's unnecessary?

I do. I don't know if there's ever been any real-world usage of
DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS. Let's not repeat my mistake in the new interface.

Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to