4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <[email protected]>

commit 34f41c0316ed52b0b44542491d89278efdaa70e4 upstream.

For e.g. HZ=100, timer being 430 jiffies in the future, and 32 bit
unsigned int, there is an overflow on unsigned int right-hand side
of the expression which results with wrong values being returned.

Type cast the multiplier to 64bit to avoid that issue.

Fixes: 46c8f0b077a8 ("timers: Fix get_next_timer_interrupt() computation")
Signed-off-by: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
 kernel/time/timer.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -1536,7 +1536,7 @@ u64 get_next_timer_interrupt(unsigned lo
                base->is_idle = false;
        } else {
                if (!is_max_delta)
-                       expires = basem + (nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
+                       expires = basem + (u64)(nextevt - basej) * TICK_NSEC;
                /*
                 * If we expect to sleep more than a tick, mark the base idle:
                 */


Reply via email to