On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:32:16AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:16:05PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hehe, _another_ scheme...
> > Yes I think this works.. but I had just sort of understood the last one.
> > How about I do this on top? That I think is a combination of what I
> > proposed last and your single invalidate thing. Combined they solve the
> > problem with the least amount of extra storage (a single int).
> I'm sorry for saying that.. I'm not sure if this works well.
OK, I'll sit on the patch a little while, if you could share your
concerns then maybe I can improve the comments ;-)