Hi Hayashi-san,

2017-07-05 20:53 GMT+09:00 Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunih...@socionext.com>:
> Add nodes of thermal monitor and thermal zone for UniPhier LD20 SoC.
> The thermal monitor is included in sysctrl.
>
> Furthermore, since the reference board doesn't have a calibrated value of
> thermal monitor, this patch gives the default value for LD20 reference
> board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunih...@socionext.com>
> ---
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dts |  4 +++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi   | 40 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dts 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dts
> index 609162a..d7f6b39 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20-ref.dts
> @@ -86,3 +86,7 @@
>  &i2c0 {
>         status = "okay";
>  };
> +
> +&pvtctl {
> +       socionext,tmod-calibration = <0x0f22 0x68ee>;
> +};


I think this calib value is shared among all boards
(ref and global).


Please move it to the SoC dtsi.




> +                       cooling-maps {
> +                               map0 {
> +                                       trip = <&cpu_alert>;
> +                                       cooling-device = <&cpu0 (-1) (-1)>;
> +                               };
> +                               map1 {
> +                                       trip = <&cpu_alert>;
> +                                       cooling-device = <&cpu2 (-1) (-1)>;
> +                               };
> +                       };
> +               };
> +       };
> +

After all, I decided to use dt-bindings headers.
Could you use THERMAL_NO_LIMIT for clarification?




-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Reply via email to