Hi.

2017-08-10 20:11 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>:
> 2017-08-10 19:37 GMT+09:00 Philipp Zabel <p.za...@pengutronix.de>:
>> Hi Katsuhiro,
>>
>> On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 16:27 +0900, Katsuhiro Suzuki wrote:
>>> Add a reset line for analog signal amplifier core (ADAMV) on
>>> UniPhier LD11/LD20 SoCs.
>>>
>>> > Signed-off-by: Katsuhiro Suzuki <suzuki.katsuh...@socionext.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
>>> index f60c137c17cb..cda4a78a58e2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
>>> @@ -196,6 +196,12 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data 
>>> uniphier_pro4_peri_reset_data[] = {
>>> >     UNIPHIER_RESET_END,
>>>  };
>>>
>>> +/* Analog signal amplifiers reset data */
>>> +static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_ld11_adamv_reset_data[] = 
>>> {
>>> > +   UNIPHIER_RESETX(100, 0x10, 6), /* EVEA */
>>> > +   UNIPHIER_RESET_END,
>>> +};


I take back my Acked-by.


The reset line index is independent from others
because this block is a separate instance.

Are you OK with starting from the reset ID 100?





-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

Reply via email to