On Thu 10-08-17 20:51:38, Michal Hocko wrote:
> OK, let's agree to disagree. As I've said I like when the critical
> section is explicit and we _know_ what it protects. In this case it is
> clear that we have to protect from the page tables tear down and the
> vma destructions. But as I've said I am not going to argue about this
> more. It is more important to finally fix this.
Now that I've reread, it may sound different than I thought. I meant to
say that I will not argue about which solution is better and both
patches are good to go. I will let others to decide but I would be glad
if we go with something finally.