On Thu 10-08-17 20:51:38, Michal Hocko wrote: [...] > OK, let's agree to disagree. As I've said I like when the critical > section is explicit and we _know_ what it protects. In this case it is > clear that we have to protect from the page tables tear down and the > vma destructions. But as I've said I am not going to argue about this > more. It is more important to finally fix this.
Now that I've reread, it may sound different than I thought. I meant to say that I will not argue about which solution is better and both patches are good to go. I will let others to decide but I would be glad if we go with something finally. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs