On 08/15/2017 10:53 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: Khalid Aziz <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:25:55 -0600@@ -1399,6 +1399,12 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, (flags & TTU_MIGRATION)) { swp_entry_t entry; pte_t swp_pte; + + if (arch_unmap_one(mm, vma, address, pteval) < 0) { + set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval); + ret = false; + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); + break; /* * Store the pfn of the page in a special migration * pte. do_swap_page() will wait until the migration @@ -1410,6 +1416,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma, if (pte_soft_dirty(pteval)) swp_pte = pte_swp_mksoft_dirty(swp_pte); set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, swp_pte); + }This basic block doesn't look right. I think the new closing brace is intended to be right after the new break; statement. If not at the very least the indentation of the existing code in there needs to be adjusted.
Hi Dave, Thanks. That brace needs to move up right after break. I will fix that. -- Khalid

