On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:35:37 -0700 "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And then this: > [ 278.835674] RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (2123) > [ 278.835684] [<c0104e0f>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 > [ 278.835701] [<c0105a26>] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > [ 278.835713] [<c0105ab3>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 > [ 278.835723] [<f95c660a>] addrconf_notify+0x5dd/0x7d0 [ipv6] > [ 278.835795] [<c0125572>] notifier_call_chain+0x2b/0x4a > [ 278.835809] [<c01255be>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x19/0x1f > [ 278.835822] [<c01255de>] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x1a/0x1c > [ 278.835834] [<c025041e>] netdev_state_change+0x23/0x35 > [ 278.835849] [<c0258e76>] rtnl_setlink+0x34f/0x3ef > [ 278.835861] [<c025845e>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x198/0x1b2 > [ 278.835873] [<c025f4b3>] netlink_run_queue+0x6f/0xe1 > [ 278.835885] [<c0258277>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x29/0x44 > [ 278.835896] [<c025f82c>] netlink_data_ready+0x15/0x55 > [ 278.835907] [<c025e877>] netlink_sendskb+0x22/0x53 > [ 278.835918] [<c025f1f0>] netlink_unicast+0x1bb/0x1d5 > [ 278.835929] [<c025f80b>] netlink_sendmsg+0x246/0x252 > [ 278.835940] [<c02472e6>] sock_sendmsg+0xcc/0xe5 > [ 278.835951] [<c0247beb>] sys_sendto+0xcc/0xec > [ 278.835961] [<c0247c41>] sys_send+0x36/0x38 > [ 278.835971] [<c02483f6>] sys_socketcall+0x13e/0x241 > [ 278.835982] [<c0103e66>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x99 > [ 278.835993] ======================= yes, that's the one I mentioned in the release notes. It appears to be harmless. Dave has identified some fishiness in the netlink code which might have caused this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
