On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 10:23 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Andrew Jeffery <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 14:52 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Yong Li <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On AST2500, the hardware strap register(SCU70) only accepts write ‘1’, > > > > to clear it to ‘0’, must set bits(write ‘1’) to SCU7C > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yong Li <[email protected]> > > > > > > Patch applied with Andrew's review/test tags. > > > > I realised after I sent the tags on v3 that I'd made a mistake: There's a > > slightly awkward to test bug in the v3 implementation. I followed up on v3 > > with > > this: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/16/905 > > > > And Yong sent out a corresponding v4: > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/802946/ > > Ah. I got confused and picked the wrong version.
Entirely my fault. Apologies again for the confusion. I owe you a few drinks if
we ever meet :)
>
> > I see you've pushed Yong's v3 in pinctrl/devel - can we revert/remove that
> > and
> > apply v4?
>
> No I would have to revert the patch.
>
> Can't we simply make a small fixup patch?
I couldn't recall what the rebase policy was for pinctrl/devel.
I have sent the fixup patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/804981/
Cheers,
Andrew
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
