On 24/08/2017 17:38, Yu Zhang wrote: >> >> >> In practice, MAXPHYADDR will never be 59 even because the PKRU bits are >> at bits 59..62. > > Thanks, Paolo. > I see. I had made an assumption that MAXPHYADDR shall not exceed the > physical one, > which is 52 I believe. But I'm not sure there's any place to check this. > Maybe we should make sure the vcpu->arch.maxphyaddr will not be greater > than the value of the host?
That's a separate change anyway. In any case, since currently the MAXPHYADDR is not validated, your change to rsvd_bits makes sense. Paolo
