On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:46:30 AM CEST Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > > The function acpi_processor_check_duplicates is local to the source and > does not need to be in global scope, so make it static. > > Cleans up sparse warnings: > symbol 'acpi_processor_check_duplicates' was not declared. Should it > be static? > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > index f098e25b6b41..86c10599d9f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c > @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static acpi_status __init > acpi_processor_ids_walk(acpi_handle handle, > > } > > -void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void) > +static void __init acpi_processor_check_duplicates(void) > { > /* check the correctness for all processors in ACPI namespace */ > acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_PROCESSOR, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, >
Applied, thanks!
