On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 03:55:17PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:09:00PM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote: > > Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR > > > > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 5 +---- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > index 9c40da5..90cda5b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > @@ -1156,10 +1156,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_resets_get(struct tegra_pcie > > *pcie) > > return PTR_ERR(pcie->afi_rst); > > > > pcie->pcie_xrst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, "pcie_x"); > > - if (IS_ERR(pcie->pcie_xrst)) > > - return PTR_ERR(pcie->pcie_xrst); > > - > > - return 0; > > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pcie->pcie_xrst); > > } > > I'm not a big fan of this construct because it's a pain to undo this if > ever we need to add code to this function. But since we do have scripts > that will flag this, I guess this would pop up every now and again. The > driver is unlikely to change in this part, too, so:
What do you suggest ? Shall I stop sending these patches ? Thanks -Himanshu Jha > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
