Hi,

On 29/08/2017 at 19:16:59 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO rather than if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR
> 

I'm not taking that kind of useless changes (especially since it make
the code less readable) unless you have other significant improvement in
those drivers.

> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 5 +----
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c    | 5 +----
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> index b253bf1..1e200a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c
> @@ -202,10 +202,7 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
>       rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
>                                               &dc_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> -     if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev))
> -             return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev);
> -
> -     return 0;
> +     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc->rtc_dev);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id dc_dt_ids[] = {
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> index ccfc9d4..9a02ca7 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1347.c
> @@ -155,10 +155,7 @@ static int ds1347_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
>       rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&spi->dev, "ds1347",
>                               &ds1347_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
>  
> -     if (IS_ERR(rtc))
> -             return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> -
> -     return 0;
> +     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc);
>  }
>  
>  static struct spi_driver ds1347_driver = {
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to