From: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Extend sample-parsing test cases to support new sample type PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <[email protected]> --- tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c index 6d028f4..c385848 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c @@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static bool samples_same(const struct perf_sample *s1, } } + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR) + COMP(phys_addr); + return true; } @@ -206,6 +209,7 @@ static int do_test(u64 sample_type, u64 sample_regs, u64 read_format) .mask = sample_regs, .regs = regs, }, + .phys_addr = 113, }; struct sample_read_value values[] = {{1, 5}, {9, 3}, {2, 7}, {6, 4},}; struct perf_sample sample_out; @@ -305,7 +309,7 @@ int test__sample_parsing(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u * were added. Please actually update the test rather than just change * the condition below. */ - if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR << 1) { + if (PERF_SAMPLE_MAX > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR << 1) { pr_debug("sample format has changed, some new PERF_SAMPLE_ bit was introduced - test needs updating\n"); return -1; } -- 2.4.3
