Le Thursday 26 April 2007 22:44:59 Jay Vosburgh, vous avez écrit : > Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Vincent ETIENNE wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Summary : > >> Got this trace when one network interface come down or up in a 2 > >> interfaces bonding. So far, system seems to survive to this problem > >> and works fine. > > > >I'm investigating a similar/possibly identical bug. Do you experience > >packet loss or throughput stalls, beyond just the loss of the interface > >that went down, when this happens? > > This problem looks to be one of the known locking issues with > bonding. > > Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and I have been working > offline on the locking issues in bonding over the last several weeks. > At the moment, we have a generally stable (but ugly with debug fluff and > other yuckies) patch that seems to resolve at least the majority of the > various issues. I'm thinking to clean it up for general posting early > next week, and address additional problems from there (since it's > hopefully at least a big step forward). > > -J > > --- > -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Will be more than happy to test it and report the result with the new patch. Thanks for your work, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
