H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I'm a bit leery of abusing the timespec value like this, though. A > flags field seem like it would be cleaner.
It's ugly. Then you have the parameter, which might have nice valid values, and they get ignored. I thought about it when this was discussed in the working group and thought it's a toss up. > Something else... if we're dickering with these interfaces, shouldn't we > allow setting atime as well? Why? To allow somebody to hide her/his tracks? -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
