> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 4:26 PM > To: Byungchul Park > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; linux- > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] lockdep: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt > workqueue flush > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:29:14AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > Also, lock_map_acquire() in process_one_work() is too strong for that > > purpose. lock_map_acquire_might() is enough. Replaced it. > > NAK!! traditional annotations are superior to cross-release. They are not > timing dependent.
You seem to mis-understand this. This also make them timing independent. I also agree that we need timing independent report in workqueue code. That's actually why I propose this patch. I just tried to do it in a right way.
