On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:25:53 +0200,
Lee Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2017, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:37:32 +0200,
> > Lee Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static struct mfd_cell dc_ti_dev[] = {
> > > > + {
> > > > + .name = "dc_ti_pwrbtn",
> > > > + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(power_button_resources),
> > > > + .resources = power_button_resources,
> > > > + },
> > > > + {
> > >
> > > Place these on the same line.
> >
> > Does this and ...
> >
> >
> > > > + },
> > > > + {
> > > > + .name = "dc_ti_region",
> > > > + },
> > >
> > > This should be a one line entry:
> > >
> > > { .name = "dc_ti_region" },
> >
> > .... this match together? The result would be like:
> >
> > static struct mfd_cell dc_ti_dev[] = {
> > {
> > .name = "dc_ti_pwrbtn",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(power_button_resources),
> > .resources = power_button_resources,
> > }, {
> > .name = "chtdc_ti_adc",
> > .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources),
> > .....
> > }, { .name = "chtdc_ti_region", },
> > };
> >
> > which I find a bit inconsistent.
>
> No, it doesn't.
Heh, I find such a mixture annoying, but it's a matter of taste.
> The single lines need to be on their own.
So did I already in the v5 patch submitted yesterday.
thanks,
Takashi
