* Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:36:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > The only user was the 64-bit opportunistic SYSRET failure path, and
> > > that path didn't really need it. This change makes the
> > > opportunistic SYSRET code a bit more straightforward and gets rid of
> > > the label.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 5 ++---
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Btw, you need to refresh your stuff because of those UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> > things. I get:
> >
> > checking file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> > Hunk #1 succeeded at 245 (offset 5 lines).
> > Hunk #2 FAILED at 308.
> > Hunk #3 succeeded at 637 (offset 88 lines).
> > 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
> >
> > Otherwise
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>
>
> I'd suggest tip:master or upstream 24e700e291d5 as a post-merge-window base
> for
> x86 bits.
Actually, scratch that, 1c9fe4409ce3 is probably the best base, it includes the
PCID fixes. Haven't had much time to test that base though.
Thanks,
Ingo
