3.16.48-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Drokin <[email protected]>

commit 0a33252e060e97ed3fbdcec9517672f1e91aaef3 upstream.

lov_getstripe() calls set_fs(KERNEL_DS) so that it can handle a struct
lov_user_md pointer from user- or kernel-space.  This changes the
behavior of copy_from_user() on SPARC and may result in a misaligned
access exception which in turn oopses the kernel.  In fact the
relevant argument to lov_getstripe() is never called with a
kernel-space pointer and so changing the address limits is unnecessary
and so we remove the calls to save, set, and restore the address
limits.

Signed-off-by: John L. Hammond <[email protected]>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/6150
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3221
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Li Wei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/lov/lov_pack.c
@@ -592,18 +592,10 @@ int lov_getstripe(struct obd_export *exp
        struct lov_mds_md *lmmk = NULL;
        int rc, lmm_size;
        int lum_size;
-       mm_segment_t seg;
 
        if (!lsm)
                return -ENODATA;
 
-       /*
-        * "Switch to kernel segment" to allow copying from kernel space by
-        * copy_{to,from}_user().
-        */
-       seg = get_fs();
-       set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
-
        /* we only need the header part from user space to get lmm_magic and
         * lmm_stripe_count, (the header part is common to v1 and v3) */
        lum_size = sizeof(struct lov_user_md_v1);
@@ -672,6 +664,5 @@ int lov_getstripe(struct obd_export *exp
 
        obd_free_diskmd(exp, &lmmk);
 out_set:
-       set_fs(seg);
        return rc;
 }

Reply via email to