On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 02:16:49PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> Add new device tree binding for max1619.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <[email protected]>

Technically that should already work, without explicit binding,
or did the i2c core change lately ?

Guenter

> Cc: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/max1619.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/max1619.c b/drivers/hwmon/max1619.c
> index a182789..76d9669 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/max1619.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/max1619.c
> @@ -303,10 +303,20 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id max1619_id[] = {
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max1619_id);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static const struct of_device_id max1619_of_match[] = {
> +     { .compatible = "maxim,max1619", },
> +     {},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, max1619_of_match);
> +#endif
> +
>  static struct i2c_driver max1619_driver = {
>       .class          = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
>       .driver = {
>               .name   = "max1619",
> +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(max1619_of_match),
>       },
>       .probe          = max1619_probe,
>       .id_table       = max1619_id,
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

Reply via email to